Last year, Masie Belek, head of the Standing Committee of the Ministerial Conference, spoke about the budgetary proposal — argued that it was not justified in funding for entities whose legality was eroding by International Court case law.
Krystyna Pawłowicz: No pay
“We’re not receiving our salary,” Pawłowicz said. Asked, the judge was not paid, so she replied that they would not receive it in February for the first time.
The wpolityce.pl portal, which was also applied to the court in question in question, received the answer: “The Ministry of Finance’s arrears against a Constitutional Court judge is now on a single salary (fee constitutional court judge’s compensation).” “Some of the Constitutional Court judges are asking the Constitutional Court president to pay the fees that have been deferred due to pretrial payment requests,” Portal said.
Pawłowicz said the Constitutional Court president is taking action on the issue. -But this is a shocking attack by Polish, Polish institutions, constitutional bodies and Polish authorities on independent courts and independent judges, with no words – Powich said.
She emphasized that the Constitution ensures that “working conditions and compensation are provided” to constitutional court judges. In her opinion, “This is an open fracture of constitutional and state violence.” “This has criminal liability,” she said.
“This authority identifies the Constitutional Court as the opposition despite the fact that we were legally elected by the SEJM,” she said.
Pat at the Constitutional Court
On January 17, President Andrzej Duda signed the Budget Act, but in subsequent mode of administration sent some of the provisions to the Constitutional Court. The Minister of KPRPMałgorzata Paprocka explained that, according to the President, such serious changes in the KRS and TK budgets should be assessed by the Constitutional Court.
The Constitutional Court in its current form has been criticized by current authorities and by the lawyers citing the decision. Ecthr and the CJEU rated it as a politicized institution. Therefore, on March 6th last year, SEJM adopted a resolution on the elimination of the effects of the 2015-2023 constitutional crisis. It stated that “in the activities of the authority of the public authorities, any decisions issued in violation of the law may be considered a violation of the principles of legalism by these bodies.” The SEJM also recognized, among other things, that Jarosław Wymbak and Justyn Piskorski, who are currently arbitrated, were not judges of the Constitutional Court.
From the adoption of this resolution by SEJM, no Constitutional Court decisions have been published in the Journal of Laws.
Pełczyńska-nałęcz of “Event Guest”: Hungarian Orban behaves like a Russian troll in Uepolsat News
Do you have any suggestions or comments, or do you see the error? Please write to us
