On Monday, President’s Office head Małgorzata Paprocka announced that he would take into account the role of the president, among other things. As a “guard of the Constitution” and “standing on the wall behind the judge,” it was difficult to expect the president to accept the records contained in the SO.
She added that Andrzej Duda also signalled her conversation with the former Sejm Szymon Hołownia. – The President directs the decision to reject this law (…), namely to consider it by the SEJM – she said.
Refusal to conduct accidental. Hołownia: It deepens uncertainty about elections
Hołownia mentioned the presidential veto on social media. “The President is vitos accidental laws that I report and deepen and deepen the legal uncertainty surrounding the presidential election,” he said in an entry on Platform X.
The former SEJM also announced a take-off on the issue. “I will persuade the Union partners to look for other ways to avoid the national crisis,” he declared, emphasizing that “the election must be decided by ur.”
– One of the most important exams faced by a political leader is to provide his strength, his position, and the safety of his successors. Sorry, President Andrzej Duda did not pass the exam – he added later in a conversation with a journalist.
As he appreciated, the president “put his hands down” in the judicial turmoil.
-This confusion leads to questioning what approval will be for approval of the validity of presidential elections in the Republic of Poland. Can the President really be effectively guaranteed to choose people of ur rather than some officials with this mixed chaos on the Supreme Court?
As he recalled, the first version of the Act on the Efficacy of Presidential Elections was to be decided by a judge appointed by Lech Kaczyński.
– I don’t understand that I don’t like his lawyer, President Andrze Duda today. Why does he think these judges are not worth it? – asked the ex-s.
Hołownia further declared: “I will do everything on my own, and I will ensure that the Polish people choose Polish president.”
“Unfortunate Law.” Hołownia opposed the proposal of former Mar.
According to So-Called’s assumption, remind me of the contingent law, the validity of the 2025 presidential election, will be ruled by 15 Supreme Court judges to hold the oldest service as a judge. Currently, the extraordinary management office and public service capabilities of the Supreme Court.
However, in the face of uncertainty, for some of the political scenes, we proposed a change in the status of this Room Polish Leader 2050.
Szymon Hołownia argued that the accidental law was “safe for presidential elections,” and called for compromise on the case. – Let the President give up on this extraordinary control room. Let go of judge status at this moment – he suggested.
I would like to remind all judges of the Supreme Court, including those appointed by the Judiciary Committee ordered after 2017 – that it will enable the validity of the election.
However, the law convinced the suspect that not only the President, but also the left reported this solution. – This is not an accident, it is an unfortunate law. Because accidental cooperation with evil is evil. Does one off and episode of such collaboration improve the situation and improve the state of the rule of law in Poland? Well, no – pointed out the chairman of the group.
In her opinion, the proposal that the validity of a presidential election will be determined by a judge in the three rooms is pointless. Older judges would not want to decide on the composition of the judiciary. Neothinking, those who have been the result of the current national council of justice.
Tomchik from “Graffiti” on military training: voluntary yet universal sat news
Do you have any suggestions or comments, or do you see the error? Please write to us
