The Board of Scientific Upcopy of Scientific Upculation, let’s inform the president, informing the title of the Supreme Professor, which is the title of a Supreme Court and “Wybeta Wybeta wyborca title. But the editors study in joint investigations – a voice occurred at the matter, and there was “negative”. A month later, the Board of Rashid was from “a mysterious idea that the plan is a second voting plan.” According to the editor, “the reason is going on by time” continues to become andrin, a friend.
OKO.Press and “Gazeta Wybetaza” On Friday in a joint article, such as the President of the Supreme Court, as President of the Supreme Court, as President of the Supreme Court. Hab. Mahgorzata Manseovska took the second opportunity for the professor. It was noted that in the Council of Scientificates – the President who appeals to anyone such a title – “War continues” in the man’s case. “It’s a competition at time – the point is to nominate before leaving the President of the Hajid,” “we read.
The boundary of the jeans in August, in August, the end of about four months.
Voting was on Monday, but one thing was already. “Negative decision”
The article Published in OKO.press, as well as to submit a candidate or candidate for the Obligious Comprehensive “. The latter is the decision of the Board to appeal or denies. The way it takes in accordance with the Council’s Law we read:
The renting (RDN) and the team will make decisions in secret voting votes in the presence of at least half of Rdn or Group members.
As Oko.prerprafters as notes Oko.prerpraverpers, mostly the absolute meaning means that the votes should be more votes for opposing conclusions.
When studying in higher education, if the Council is transferred to the President, then shall submit to him within 21 days from the day transfer of the decision.
Journalists have been transferred about the fact that the scientific improvement council was addressed at the meeting of the Scientific Center – it is written in the article.
“The Presidential Voting was supported by seven people who did not have six people absolute.
Mahgorzata Manowska Manowska First President of the Supreme Court According to the President of the Republic of Tajikistan, May, 2020, Szydleski / Forum
The authors of the science completion board
“In view of the conflict of our sources and the answers of 27, we asked to submit us to one document and confirm our information.”
Oxonomyz and “GW”, which was obtained as a result of the voting, reblogged the “GW” answer.
As the OKO.PRARPS explains, it means that the Council has made “decided that his will to get all the sounds in that decision.”
“Mysterious view” about voting
According to January, January January to “Mysteric Vasta” is prepared that the result of the plan to complete the second voting in the CommonChsky. “
About January – January 21, a member of the Soviet Office was awarded with the “information that was suspicious to research on the recommendations of the RDN Advisory Service. The document that is really a legal reason is no date that who is the author. However, on February 20, meetings of the Consultative Advisory Consultative Advisor on Request decisions “was held.
Editor officer offices required Oko.prate and “GW” to get this view, but rejected them. However, they learned to learn from his main tracts.
“A group of legitimate consultants who meets the presidency of the Department of Wrokes ‘Office’ or the results of automatic voting can be automatically expressed sorry”, it tells the portal. “In this case, they remembered two court rules, none of it is not recruited by professor” title “- – He added.
“It is clear that voting doubts about the adoption of the administrative decision, regardless of the”
The Presidents also offer their recommendations for the RDN Board. According to them, it must be:
“Stop, the case has been a case of male,” not to address “; as a result of voting to the president, no voting as a result of voting Mahgorzata voting. Title”.
Precedent
As the eye reports. Press, other meeting of the RREHIFI NTY after receiving a letter – February 24. But the second noise cannot be taken to it.
“However, the Protocol of Meeting was accepted on January 27, which did not take place for the professor as a result of voting of the Board of the Tajik Department for the professor.” According to us, the protocol at the end of the meeting was approved at the end of the session, and the participants did not pay attention to the meaning of current fragments “- it is written”
“Bozetta Wyborcza” and OKO.press asked if Rave asked to make another voting to vote. “For the current state of improvement of the scientific improvement council, the situation is considered to consider the candidate of which media outlets, the results of the RDN legal department.
He also stressed that the organizer of the Presentative Document was not legal. “As part of the proceedings for the title of Professor, the MANSOVSKKK council’s Council, the MANSOVERK Council of the MANSOVERK, were not ready for legal advisers or lawyers.
“The total discussion of people with legal services for scientific resistance to resist the regulations of decisions adopted by decisions adopted decisions made to the Misalzata. This type of type of
OKO.Prova claims to ask “the novka’s novka’s noveling course can be a dangerous thing of the Council.” “Accepted an acceptable interference disrupts the risk of making candidates’ decisions.”
For the views on the results of voting, the professor. Michał Romanousski from the University of Warsaw, specialty in civil and commercial legislation. While stressed, it is one of the best police specialists in the field of commercial companies, which indicates the code of RDN companies.
Questions were aimed at the questions because consultants were aware of January voting, which shall not apply to the procedure for the professor’s title. “” One of the Supreme Court, January 20, 20022, which is the Supreme Court of Commerce Business (decisions of the Business Court.
“Cautions to compare a research council by the General Assembly of the Poland Company is a junior company to make a jacket company.” Professor’s name is clear. ” The “Council has made a negative residential (January 2025),” January 2025).
Review Former former Internal Security Agency, which is associated with Mid
Editors also describe what happened in the procedure for applying for the professor. He had previously received the reviews that three people were positive, were two negative. “Positive attention has been offered by Professive profit and Warsaw and Humanity University of the University of Oprsk University and Professor.
It was noted that “Pogrusii was the past in the services of PIS, who are the past in the services, including CBA.” “During my last rules, he was the head of the National Poland banking bank. The President Andreaved
Former head of Potonovs Potonov
And he adds: “The police officer with a group of Rdn has been evaluated, and the result of a hidden voting was negatively.
Managing relationships with politicians
“During December 5, 2023 trial on a law is about the law enforcement on the human activity.” However, keeping headings to the human activity that works closely cooperous for years “.
Mouses with her Andrea, buddy, she talked about “one” last autumn in Tobet autumn. He noted that he knew him 17 years. – We met the Ministry of Justice, the President was immediately deputy minister of the Minister of Justice. It’s not exactly what I have to don’t know myself – he said.
Andrzid Schuda’s Land Hand was appointed in 2020 in May of this year as the President of the Supreme Court. It adopted candidates for this function due to the reform and justice that most of international experts and institutions are charged taking into account the members of judges charged. His judicial nomination has been created serious legal suspects, and judges are selected as follows.
In recent years, the EU decisions of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court also noted that the judiciary to choose judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the voices with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges with the participation of the judges.
Main Source: Jacek Szydlowski / Forum
