In a speech at a conference held in Washington by the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), Kellogg presented a Trump administration strategy that led him to approach war. As he said, America abandoned its current approach, where she supported one of the parties, but instead she just wanted to end the fight.
See: Keith Kellogg has come to Kiev. The Ukrainian president invites him to the front
The retired general said the one-sided victory sales “just help bring America into endless foster care,” the retired general said.
In a speech with CBS journalists and subsequent conversations, Margaret Brennan said the US goal is to reset ties with Russia to break the “global axis” of Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.
General Keith Kellogg: Washington wants to reset with Moscow
– President Trump’s approach to this war also has a broader strategy. This is based on realizing that the US must reset its ties with Russia – he said. He added: “The lack of further insulation and involvement in conversations with Russia during the war in Ukraine is no longer a feasible or balanced strategy, and certainly not a responsible diplomatic approach from the United States.”
See also: Kellogg has cancelled a meeting with Zelanski. “According to US demands.”
He estimated that peace would be beneficial to everyone and would “be an opportunity to break this axis that we are currently observing.
Referring to the damage to military and intelligence news support for Ukraine, Kellogg said the Ukrainians “bring it to themselves,” and at a recent White House meeting he would publicly undermine President Trump’s approach. He said he had a clear warning to Zelansky, what would be the consequences of not maintaining the mineral agreement and not maintaining public questions about President Trump’s actions.
White House queue. “Zełenski read the situation wrongly.”
He also appreciated Zelansky “reading the situation wrongly” and hoped that the US would make it public to the side of Ukraine against Russia. -This negates the objective role of the mediator. But President Trump didn’t approach it in a way that one side gained an advantage over the other – he added.
See: Putin spoke about the need for peace. He made clear about his meaning
He personally compared the approach of President Theodore Roosevelt, the mediator of the end of the Russian and Japanese wars in 1905 and Nobel Peace Prize-winning President Theodore Roosevelt, and Trump’s approach to negotiations. Kellogg admitted that stopping help was painful for Kiev, but he attracted attention by comparing it to “sliding the mule on the noseboard.”
The diplomat pointed out that the break is a temporary suspension and is not permanently supported. When asked about what Ukraine must do to restore our help, he replied that he must forward a list of conditions regarding the end of the conflict. He also personally rated that he “will not move forward” until the minerals agreement is signed, but noted that it is President Trump’s responsibility.
War in Ukraine. Trump’s envoy on peace negotiations
Kellogg also said Trump’s administration is not only looming on Ukraine, but also referring to the sanctions and freezes on Russian assets, and that he will “take an offensive move to put pressure on Russians.” However, when he realized that these actions had been carried out by the previous administration, the diplomats presented Russia with a list of its terms and stated that Ukraine was not, suggesting that this was the reason for the pressure on the surface.
He appreciates Russia as acting “rationally” than Ukraine, and if its official declaration excludes the existence of Ukrainian foreign troops, they are merely the starting point for negotiations. When asked about the existence of European stabilization forces in Ukraine and the US assurance of these forces, Kellogg said it is important to determine how specific it is on this issue.
See: Zełnski is definitely about Russia. “He can prove he wants to end the war.”
Speaking of the terms of possible agreements, Kellogg denied what the Special Middle Eastern envoy said earlier, Steve Witkov, that is, that the basis for the contract would be a project of the contract presented during negotiations in Istanbul in March 2022. The weakening of Ukraine. They said, among other things, about the size restrictions of the Ukrainian military, and resolve the exclusion of NATO membership and the status of Crimea in 10 years.
“I think we have to develop something completely new,” Kellogg said. -Even if Ukraine agrees to some terms at that time, you will need to see the time frame when it is done (…) We must return to today. We can’t go back three years ago – he pointed out.
The browser does not support video players…
NN/SGO/PAP
read more
Source link
